Tuesday, 7 December 2010

Classic Survey: Results

campnou50.jpg After the close of polls on Thursday, today published the results thereof. In the fourteen issues mandatory to participate in the survey have 1140 voters participated, a number that has exceeded our best expectations. In assessing the average players of votes received by each of around 1040 users. Thank you all for participating. Here are the results:

1. Who was the best party?

  • Andres Iniesta: 7% (85)
  • David Villa: 6% (68)
  • Lionel Messi: 21% (242)
  • Xavi Hernandez: 67% (723)
  • Other: 2% (22)

As expected, Xavi won the street: the party that took off was one of the largest exhibits of a playmaker I've seen in my life. What I find surprising is that Messi appears as the second because, as we shall see, voting is in addition to Xavi, two friends in front of him.

2. Who was the worst in the game?

  • Pepe: 2% (22)
  • Sergio Ramos: 64% (730)
  • Mesut Özil: 9% (104)
  • Karim Benzema: 18% (209)
  • Other: 7% (75)

Sergio Ramos has been lime prize after making a match to forget, which was overwhelmed by all who challenged him (Villa, Iniesta, Pedro, Messi ...) and eventually expelled and totally deranged. Such has been the majority of voters who chose the Andalusian and worst man of the match that Benzema just below the lateral stresses.

3. How bad would share the blame for the Madrid game?

  • Mourinho over that of the players: 44% (504)
  • Most of the players that Mourinho: 37% (426)
  • All because of Mourinho: 4% (48)
  • All the fault of the players: 6% (65)
  • No blame: 9% (97)

While ultimately the choice that Mourinho was more to blame than the players is the next most popular, if we take a look at the other results, I think we should conclude that the faults are widely dispersed. Less than one in ten participants understand that there is no blame and taking into account the comments of the post, I think many of them come to that conclusion because they give all the credit to partidazo Blaugrana.

4. What is your opinion of Lass change?

  • Well, it was an option to go up: 8% (87)
  • Well, we had to try not thrashed out: 24% (274)
  • Badly, losing 2-0 to do more offensive changes: 50% (567)
  • Mal, have drawn but not Özil Lass: 19% (212)

Just half of voters judged that, going two goals down, did not have to Lass, but another variant offensive. On the other side of the scale, a quarter believe it was a nice change to find not to be thrashed.

5. Do you think Mourinho is played after the 5-0?

  • Yes: 70% (803)
  • No: 30% (337)

As he was commissioned to highlight, last Monday was the first time a Mourinho team received many goals, being at the home of arch-rivals, having been signed to overthrow the Pep Team and having prepared the meeting with the importance Real Madrid gave her the figure of Mourinho has been played for more than two thirds of the voters.

6. Do you think Mourinho will cut one head?

  • No: 46% (522)
  • Yes, of Özil: 7% (85)
  • Yes, Palm: 11% (130)
  • Yes, Benzema: 46% (526)
  • Other: 6% (66)

Interestingly, there is a tie between those who think that Mourinho will not cross anybody famous and those who believe that Benzema is back to where it was a couple of months, or worse. Ramos is noteworthy that the worst of the game for more than 60% of you, only 11% carried this vote means a signal that has earned credit. (Note that, as could vote more than one option, the sum of the numbers exceed 100%).

7. Do you think that Guardiola was wrong in not giving the ball to Cristiano?

  • Yes, a coach can not do that: 42% (484)
  • I do not think it is for both: 58% (656)

The trial on the set between Christian Guardiola and gives us more equal vote, with a slight majority believes that the act of not giving the ball is not so bad as we have tried to paint from some media.

8How was the play between Christian and Valdes?

  • Penalty: 29% (336)
  • Door Pull: 71% (804)

I recognize that this result is what has surprised me most, if not almost the only one. To me, seeing it repeated, it seemed a penalty as a cathedral, because even though the ball was lost and Valdes and attempts to restrain, the truth is that it seems to me that overwhelms blaugrana goalkeeper CR7. However, there is the eloquent 71% ...

9. Do you think if he had whistled the penalty and had put Madrid 2-1 on encounter would have taken another course?

  • Yes, the game would have changed: 17% (194)
  • No, the club Real Madrid would have eaten all about it: 83% (946)

Such was the difference was between a computer and one on the pitch less than a fifth of voters think that if Madrid had been 2-1 since we would have seen a game more even.

10. What is your opinion of the gesture of pique with the "hand"?

  • Evil is a gesture that won plenty of well: 21% (237)
  • Well, it seems a normal gesture at the time: 41% (470)
  • It can be done at home but not out: 38% (433)

The option that received the most votes is those who think that there is nothing wrong with the gesture of the 'little hand' and if they also join those who think it's something you can do in the local stadium (but not away from home), we see that only one in five participants felt a gesture out of place.

11. Do you think that Ramos should have been given more than a match?

  • No, a game it just me parce: 13% (143)
  • Yes, Messi deserved entry to more than one-match ban: 27% (303)
  • Yes, the two sets with Puyol and Xavi deserve a higher penalty: 61% (694)

A similar vote at the last. Almost two in three believe that Ramos deserved to get stronger punishment to hand out cookies and also a quarter thought single entry into Messi deserved a greater punishment.

12. Regarding the game displayed by the club, what game is better?

  • The 2-6, two years ago: 11% (123)
  • The 5-0 on Monday: 89% (1017)

We might have affected the closeness of the 5-0 and our memory that has darkened a bit dramatic 2-6, but the truth is that almost 9 out of 10 we are left with the last blast.

13. Who will win the league?

  • Barca: 66% (758)
  • Madrid: 10% (114)
  • I do not want or dare to get wet: 24% (268)

Not much to say about it, just amazes me that almost a quarter of voters do not want or dare to get wet ...

14. Regarding the previous question, yesterday's game has changed your opinion?

  • Yes: 16% (180)
  • No: 84% (960)

When I asked this question told my partners that he believed the other would walk by 15%, not more, and the truth is that it seems that I refined my outlook pretty.

ASSESSMENT OF THE PLAYERS

Although the ratings were raised over a maximum of 5 points, at the time of presenting the results I thought that pass data to a note of 10 would facilitate the understanding of the data.

FC Barcelona

  • Valdés: 6.96
  • Abidal: 7.52
  • Puyol: 8.64
  • Piqué: 8.34
  • Alves: 8.54
  • Busquets: 8.94
  • Xavi: 9.86
  • Iniesta: 9.64
  • Pedro: 8.94
  • Villa: 9.60
  • Messi: 9.52
  • Bojan: 6.66
  • Jeffren: 7.36

No Barça low of 6.66, which is the lowest note, Bojan, and only one more is less than 7: Valdés, who forty meters walking his numbers to participate in several insurance brawl that have gone somewhat expensive vote. On the other hand, up to four players (Messi, Villa, Iniesta and Xavi) exceed 9.5, with six reaching an amazing 9.86.

Real Madrid CF

  • Casillas: 5.06
  • Marcelo: 3.12
  • Pepe: 4.90
  • Carvalho: 3.86
  • Ramos: 2.44
  • Khedira: 3.42
  • Alonso: 4.60
  • Özil: 3.06
  • Di María: 3.90
  • Christian: 3.78
  • Benzema: 2.64
  • Lass: 3.88
  • Arbeloa: 3.58

The single player is Íker merengue approving Casillas, whose position on its hands after the fourth goal seemed a lasiáeeenes of the party. The three worst are rated Marcelo, who gets just the three, Benzema and Sergio Ramos, who is punished with a 2.44 with a very poor night to forget he had.

Photo | borkur.net



No comments:

Post a Comment