Who do you think it is more difficult to reach the final between Real and Barca?: The question of the week in Football Notes

The defeats of Real Madrid and Barcelona in the first leg of the semifinals of the Champions League caught off guard a lot. Few expected that Real Madrid and Barca fell on their travels to Munich and London, complicating face the second leg at their respective stadiums, something that inevitably hold two Spanish representatives in the continental showpiece. That is why this week, NDF, we want to ask:

Who do you think it is more difficult to reach the final between Real and Barca?

To those of Mourinho, who managed to score at the Allianz Arena , would be enough a goal in the Bernabeu to be in the final. Something that, seeing the numbers that handles all white, does not sound crazy. Guardiola, who ended his locker to zero , will have a touchdown to even the tie and another to get a ticket to Munich. In favor of whites and the result plays against the opponent. At the opposite happens Blaugrana: for, the rival, and against the result. Who has it harder? Do you agree with that Bayern is the Chelsea team but, however, the result of the trip is best for Real Madrid for the Catalans? Particularly I think both will and the more tortuous is the brunt of Madrid against an opponent who has more arguments than the counter and see them come, strategy Chelsea against Barca. As always, I appreciate that contestéis in the Answers section .

Last week's answer: What is your player 'fetish'?

Last week we asked in our Answers section player who, for whatever reason be, if you liked by some strange (or not so) reason. Reviews for everyone flooded an issue that brought out the names of Julen Guerrero, Tiko, Scholes, Hamsik, Robinho, Guti, Quaresma, Luis Enrique, Guardiola, Turu Flores, Leroy, Rebrov, Geremi, Prosinecki, Lora, Mata, Mauricio Pinilla, Le Tissier, Valeron, Weah, Ronaldo, Jairo Castillo, Ulises de la Cruz, Titov, Guayre, Pablo Counago, Ryan Babel, Coutinho, Ronaldinho, Riquelme, Rodrigo Palacio and Daniel Bilos, Kepa Blanco, Roger, De la Peña , Baros, Martin and Raul Vasquez ... in response josef84 was chosen as the best for you:

Raul, Raul, Raul and Raul. Their first competition that followed from beginning to end was the World Cup 94 in United States (was ten). I was already Madrid from 92 at least, but spent a lot of following football in general. So the first link I followed (including trading cards collection) was 94-95. The explosion of Zamorano, disclosure of Amavisca, the Barca's 5-0 and the debut of Raul. So debuted in Madrid while I became a loyal fan. I grew up while he did. I dreamed that I give away his jersey (that of 96-97, which took first in the 'seven' in a fixed manner as the previous season No. 7 led Esnaider and Raul played with number 17) but never got that gift. I know that its action is not sports but the day that silenced the Camp Nou was the first time that Madrid did not lose at Barça in the league for almost two decades. That 'shisst' marked the beginning of the decadence and splendor culé merengue. Raul is the best my childhood and adolescence times were not always easy but beautiful and never return. The decline coincided with Raul certain bitter moments of my young adulthood and her little second youth with a current staff time that I considered very good.

Not the best. It never will be and do not know if it ever was, but inside me there is a kid who would give all the gold balls in the world. And there would be few.

In NDF Answers | Who do you think it is more difficult to reach the final between Real and Barca?