The Moviola, invented in 1924, was the first machine for editing movies on film, and allowed publishers to study each image shot or slow down in order to determine what would be the best cutoff. Spanish Television decided to take this name to a new section designed to analyze the controversial plays football matches, which could slow or stop the images to try to establish whether the arbitrators had right or wrong in their decisions. The Moviola see the light in the seventies in the Farther program, which aired in the second string, but would achieve full popularity in Stage Studio, a program must if you wanted to see goals from the day before the advent of the Internet .
The Moviola elicited an angry dispute between the bus arbitration, I saw this section as a negative for the sport, placed the collegiate player of the mistakes, tried to leave them in evidence and in which only highlighted the errors. The Moviola was temporarily canceled in 1986 to the delight of school officials, but would return to stay and expand. It was only the beginning of a long tradition in which to analyze the controversial plays of the games will become an ingrained habit to become part of the usual analysis of the parties and often become the protagonist. And today is no wonder that just concluded matches, the first thing to be analyzed such controversial moves.
He comes to give as much importance to the work of arbitration often prevails over that of staff and players, much more than the goalkeeper, center or forward. Although we see a game full of nuances, with good individual performances and interesting tactical duels, you tend to repair earlier in the offside is bleeped by millimeters, in that no penalty whistled or yellow card that should see the central local and it would have meant expulsion, as if they were major arguments when defining and analyzing the outcome of a match before everything else.
As if it were something external to the game or inexcusable error, judging the performance of the referee with severe hand. As having an obligation to ascertain that football just depended on what do players and coaches. Football is a sport in which there is no Hawkeye, but that's another debate, and the referees are part of this may be right or wrong.
The fact is that the colleges are in the aim of all to the point where referees have removed programs analyze their mistakes, why not also hiring Fernando Hierro and Miguel Angel Nadal to thoroughly analyze the decisions of Sergio Ramos and Pique? There is even that of "the other league," which makes a classification for the items that were supposed to have the teams with the alleged successes of the controversial plays, regardless of every action in a game can change the outcome of it.
An indisputable fact is that, in general, like to talk about the referees, to international football if possible. In the magnificent encounter played a couple of weeks ago Chelsea and Manchester and ended tied at three after a great comeback for the Red Devils, the first to comment on was the performance of Howard Webb, who was not lucky. But if not, the television audience educate analyzing the controversial plays straight after the meeting, is what they sell but also what you buy: the snake biting its tail. Is a debate that is sought and is proposed.
The other day I lost count, desperate times and different shots that gave him offside Alexis Sanchez in Pamplona, which was to analyze whether Roberto Sergi head touched the ball overriding the position of the Chilean . So important is this not the reason the game good or bad day Osasuna Barcelona? We studied the change of trajectory of the ball and even its rotation to clarify something so that the wizard had to make in a split second. In the end, it was not entirely clear.
In NDF | What we learned this season arbitration
In NDF | The anonymous referee and his victory
 |  |
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment