Shakhtar Donetsk, how can you be so pig?

What made ​​the FC Shakhtar Donetsk FC Nordsjælland only has a name: a cerdada. The sequence of events was as follows: after 26 minutes, the Danes ahead just two minutes before putting the score 1-0, two rivals collide randomly while the Danish team has possession of the ball, the referee for the game to enter attendance and decreed a drop ball to restart play, normal in these cases, the unwritten rule respected by all, is that a player of Shakhtar is the first to touch the ball after the bounce and cede possession to Nordsjælland, since they had control of the ball at the time when the referee stopped the match. That's what should have happened.

But it was not. Luiz Adriano in action ever seen in European football's elite, used the situation to catch the ball, throw to the goal and to the disbelief of all the Danish team, dribble the goalkeeper and put the tie in the marker. Obviously, the players would want to eat Nordsjælland, increpándole by guarrada they just made. He, of course, reacted by becoming the Swede. And this is where what could have been a simple story in an authentic conviertió cerdada.

Because normal in this case is to leave Shakhtar scored a goal for his alleged error compensate. Anyone who has played football has seen in more than one of these and certainly, at least in most cases, was resolved by allowing the victim to score a goal to put everything back in place. The practice I've known is to let the captain of the opposing team a goal or target you in any case and not without a certain mood of joke, that is crossing the goalkeeper to make the field goal.

But again, it was not. Although Ukrainian coach, Mircea Lucescu, allegedly asked his players to allow the Nordsjælland tuck them a goal to compensate for what he had done Luiz Adriano of Shakhtar players refused to do so. The following explanation of the Romanian coach was: "I ordered my players who were left to score, but some did not understand me." And I and I think so ...

If you really, really of good, Lucescu had not taken advantage of the situation and respect fair play, would have found a way to impose their views. Character is not short course, all know him. Certainly not lacked in 2008 when Pep Guardiola publicly rebuked after considering that Barcelona had scored a goal advantage that one of his players lay injured on the turf. As many media are remembering, his exact words were "It's a shame, what a fair play!"

His attempt to justify in the misunderstanding of some of their players goes down alone. After the trick of Hadrian, the Nordsjælland again early lead, an advantage neutralized by the Ukrainians before the break, so it was the intermediate with a tie to two on the scoreboard. If Lucescu was really embarrassed by what happened and the whole problem was a communication error, the Romanian coach arranged around the break to give the necessary orders to his players and go talk to the referee, the delegate of the UEFA and coach of the Danes to announce that after the kick-off, would be left to score a goal compensase error and went all in place: a one-goal lead for the Nordsjælland.

He did and Shakhtar eventually won 2-5, hat-trick of Luiz Adriano inclusive, a result which, thanks to the Juventus victory over Chelsea, has classified mathematically Ukrainians for the next phase, as they have the goal average in favor with Londoners.

The UEFA has decided to initiate proceedings to Luiz Adriano "for violating the principles of conduct laid down in Article 5 of the Disciplinary Regulations," an article that says that players "will behave according to the principles of loyalty, integrity and sportsmanship", where not be "unsportsmanlike conduct themselves to take advantage." The case will be studied next 27 for its Control and Disciplinary Committee.

However, the opening of files should have been extended to coach, Mircea Lucescu, for its ineffectiveness in the event, and, by extension, to the club, as head of the behavior of their players, considering both the possibility of a monetary fine as loss of points, though, this being the first case, it should be reached this extreme but threaten such a measure if repeated.

The problem of stopping the parties to meet players is very tricky, because virtually no one game in which a player's winning team that does not resort to the typical traps waste time (in the case of Nordsjælland-Shakhtar is clear that was not a matter of loss of time, being the 26th minute of the first half). To me this kind of entanglement and farces is something that disgusts me, especially when a player on my team who uses it, because one thing is to beat the clock time when you really have a hit and quite another pretend pulls, twins increases, and so forth.

The European football arbitration bodies should take action on the matter and put a stop to somehow these behaviors. Since then it seems to me more important to regulate this type of traps that punishing the coaches go to the first bastard that gets out of your mouth. Meanwhile, there are things that fall from drawer and unwritten rules exist for a reason. What did Luiz Adriano, peers and Lucescu has no justification. Are pigs. And from now will be remembered for it.