Tuesday, 6 September 2011

Which coach will be the first to be removed?: The question of the week Football Notes

promote post-respuestas.jpg

One of the men 'hot' in recent weeks is none other than President Neuchatel Xamax , the so Bulat Chagaev, who has made ​​a name for this football not preside over the Swiss side, with money, but how it has. His coaches and even their goalkeeper, Galatto, lasted less than the blink of an eye in your organization. Al exmalaguista fit fired him for three goals in the first league match and their coaches, first Sony Anderson and now Joaquin Caparros has given Matarile unfulfilled or third championship. Bizarre decisions of those who are not aware of the mass in half, but throughout the season they are still common. Spanish is not a championship-free terminations and firings of coaches, so Question of the Week Notes Football this week brings with it certain qualities sighted and a little pissed:

Which coach will be the first to be removed?

The League has just started and it is still early to pass sentence, but in the world of the bench any slip can be fatal. Last academic year there were many coaches who were on the unemployment line soon, despite their apparent reliability earlier this season. The main pattern that follows the club leaders is simple: results. If they come, still, otherwise the street. So easy. There are some coaches in the league that are vulnerable to such actions outside its making. I come to a head Javier Aguirre, Hector Cuper, Gregorio Manzano, Jose Luis Mendilibar ... technicians who have suffered in the flesh a recall, despite their grief. So the question implies that you mojéis to see who is right or just exposes why so and so or not last menganito marking his contract. As always, the answers in the thread of the question .

Last week's answer: They must pay a fee for radio relay from 1 st and 2 nd?

The question of the last seven days had featured a topic waiting to happen as the radios and the LFP fee required to pay if they want to broadcast live matches of the domestic championship. Among the responses, of Rodericus has been the most valued by our readers, which explains the reasons why the radio medium itself should check out.

Absolutely. If the TVs do not pay for the radios are going to pay? At the end of the day also do business with a product they pay others.

But what mainly makes me say they have to pay is because the radios have wanted to embrace the "right to information." It seems out of place. The right to information was born I'm sure other ideas in mind. And not to be considered that football should be free for that right. Moreover, it is forbidden to give information. Pay and you can tell, nobody is preventing you from reporting.

I would add that it would be important if the distribution is paid fairly and do not again favoring the two forever. You pay for the product of football (as in England), not for a couple of clubs.

ndf_twitter_lafinta.png

In NDF | Question of the Week

-Be-removed-the-question-of-the-week-on-notes-de-futbol ">


No comments:

Post a Comment