Guardiola Laporta hits the pool of

No one is oblivious that Pep Guardiola is deeply grateful to Joan Laporta and his management of the bet made ​​by him and the great opportunity that was given. Nor has anyone forgotten the great sports project that the former president of FC Barcelona took place during the seven years of his mandate. And no one escapes it, I imagine, Laporta and Guardiola that unites them more than just a boss-employee relationship. Therefore, it is understandable that the current coach of Barça feel some appreciation for his former boss and friend. However, the stubborn defense that carried Guardiola Laporta on the situation regarding the liability claim has been alleged by some goings on in the coffers of the institution seems to me surprising and incomprehensible.

Barca coach will have heard many times that the club is above everything and everyone. In fact, whenever there is speculation about his possible departure from the bench, use the argument that what matters is the club, not the subjects that compose it. But what you see, when it is a personal friend seems to forget the values ​​that usually defends his feelings and puts the good of the club. And not only wrong in fact defend the indefensible, but the argument used is meaningless.

Laporta and the core strength of its management are reported on suspicion of illegally handled money belonging to the club. Recall that the current leadership came to this conclusion through an audit conducted by an entity outside the company. Let us remember also that the judge to whom the complaint came not only refused to act, but also decided that the accused should endorse his pocket that allegedly caused the deficit, a measure that a judge does not take lightly or minimum suspicion. And finally, do not forget that while the policy was led by Rosell who promoted the aforementioned petition, the commissioners were partners with their votes to ratify the decision of such a measure.

So, what's all that comes out to defend Guardiola Laporta? Does Laporta is above the club? Does Barça should look the other way? How long sporting successes justify the economic embezzlement? What is the aim Pep? To miss a possible crime because they have won countless titles?

Guardiola has screwed to the bottom. As he said in a press conference in question, reduces the entire case to the rivalry between Laporta and Rosell. He says he would like everyone to think a little more things. Rosell course I wanted him to Laporta, Laporta as he campaigned against him during the election period and instead to stay out as expected, even dared to throw some accusations on alleged legal problems in Brazil Rosell . But the issue of money not know where you can not be confined only to Laporta and Rosell from the time the partners took the floor and the final decision.

Therefore, Guardiola would have saved what he said. It is free to have opinions you want, whether Laporta, Rosell, or as any other, and express them freely, but in a personal capacity, not as Barca coach sitting in a wheel post-game press. Has committed a grave error to come out in defense of a former president that the partners have decided to bring a lawsuit. He put his hand on fire by Laporta and the judge just decided that his friend is guilty, but it will burn well.

/>